Comparing snitch.name with PeekYou, Spock, Whoisi, YoName & ex.plode.us

I think snitch.name does pretty well 🙂

PeekYou. FAIL!

peekyou

Spock. FAIL!

spock

Whoisi. FAIL!

whoisi

YoName. FAIL!

yoname

ex.plod.us. FAIL!

explode

snitch.name delivers!!!

snitchname_the-social-white-pages_beta4

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Comparing snitch.name with PeekYou, Spock, Whoisi, YoName & ex.plode.us

  1. @Dionysios Synodinos

    the point is that peekyou,spock,wink and so on have info stored and those guys just doing u a favor of doing a “google search” for you

  2. @Pavel

    IMHO the point is not the technical implementation but what service provides useful information. PeekYou, Spock, Whoisi, YoName & ex.plode.us failed to provide with any useful information whereas snitch.name delivered. I’m not advocating on its technical elegance or say it carries any technological breakthrough, I’m just saying it is useful. Plz see the user comments on that: http://snitch.name/about.html

    Storing data or using a super-duper framework/technology doesn’t make a service suck less if it is worthless 🙂

  3. I don’t care if snitch stores data on its server or looks for data on other peoples’ server. All I care is that it works. As an end user I don’t care about the underlying technology or implementation, all I care about is to do what it is supposed to be doing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s